139 lines
8.8 KiB
HTML
139 lines
8.8 KiB
HTML
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3O//DTD W3 HTML 2.0//EN">
|
||
|
|
<!Converted with LaTeX2HTML 0.6.5 (Tue Nov 15 1994) by Nikos Drakos (nikos@cbl.leeds.ac.uk), CBLU, University of Leeds >
|
||
|
|
<HEAD>
|
||
|
|
<TITLE>23.1.5.5. Discussion of Logical Pathnames</TITLE>
|
||
|
|
</HEAD>
|
||
|
|
<BODY>
|
||
|
|
<meta name="description" value=" Discussion of Logical Pathnames">
|
||
|
|
<meta name="keywords" value="clm">
|
||
|
|
<meta name="resource-type" value="document">
|
||
|
|
<meta name="distribution" value="global">
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
<b>Common Lisp the Language, 2nd Edition</b>
|
||
|
|
<BR> <HR><A NAME=tex2html4218 HREF="node214.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="next" SRC="icons/next_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4216 HREF="node208.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="up" SRC="icons/up_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4212 HREF="node212.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="previous" SRC="icons/previous_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4220 HREF="node1.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="contents" SRC="icons/contents_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4221 HREF="index.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="index" SRC="icons/index_motif.gif"></A> <BR>
|
||
|
|
<B> Next:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4219 HREF="node214.html"> Pathname Functions</A>
|
||
|
|
<B>Up:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4217 HREF="node208.html"> Logical Pathnames</A>
|
||
|
|
<B> Previous:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4213 HREF="node212.html"> Examples of the </A>
|
||
|
|
<HR> <P>
|
||
|
|
<H3><A NAME=SECTION002715500000000000000>23.1.5.5. Discussion of Logical Pathnames</A></H3>
|
||
|
|
<img align=bottom alt="change_begin" src="gif/change_begin.gif"><br>
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
Large programs can be moved between sites without changing any
|
||
|
|
pathnames, provided all pathnames used are logical. A portable system
|
||
|
|
construction tool can be created that operates on programs defined as
|
||
|
|
sets of files named by logical pathnames.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
Logical pathname syntax was chosen to be easily translated into the formats of most
|
||
|
|
popular file systems, while still being powerful enough for storing large
|
||
|
|
programs. Although they have hierarchical directories, extended wildcard
|
||
|
|
matching, versions, and no limit on the length of names, logical pathnames can be
|
||
|
|
mapped onto a less capable real file system by translating each
|
||
|
|
directory that is used into a flat directory name, processing wildcards in
|
||
|
|
the Lisp implementation rather than in the file system, treating all versions as <tt>:newest</tt>,
|
||
|
|
and using translations to shorten long names.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
Logical pathname words are restricted to non-case-sensitive letters,
|
||
|
|
digits, and hyphens to avoid creating problems with real file systems
|
||
|
|
that support limited character sets for file naming.
|
||
|
|
(If logical pathnames were
|
||
|
|
case-sensitive, it would be very difficult to map them into a
|
||
|
|
file system that is not sensitive to case in its file names.)
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
It is not a goal of logical pathnames to be able to represent all
|
||
|
|
possible file names. Their goal is rather to represent just enough file
|
||
|
|
names to be useful for storing software. Real pathnames, in contrast,
|
||
|
|
need to provide a uniform interface to all possible file names, including
|
||
|
|
names and naming conventions that are not under the control of Common
|
||
|
|
Lisp.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
The choice of logical pathname syntax, using colon, semicolon, and
|
||
|
|
period, was guided by the goals of being visually distinct from real file
|
||
|
|
systems and minimizing the use of special characters.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
The <tt>logical-pathname</tt> function is separate from the <tt>pathname</tt> function
|
||
|
|
so that the syntax of logical pathname namestrings does not constrain the
|
||
|
|
syntax of physical pathname namestrings in any way. Logical pathname
|
||
|
|
syntax must be defined by Common Lisp so that logical pathnames can be
|
||
|
|
conveniently exchanged between implementations, but physical pathname
|
||
|
|
syntax is dictated by the operating environments.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
The <tt>compile-file-pathname</tt> function and the specification of <tt>LISP</tt>
|
||
|
|
as the type of a logical pathname for a Common Lisp source file together
|
||
|
|
provide enough information about compilation to make possible a portable system
|
||
|
|
construction tool. Suppose that it is desirable
|
||
|
|
to call <tt>compile-file</tt> only if the source file is newer than the compiled
|
||
|
|
file. For this to succeed, it must be possible to know the name of the
|
||
|
|
compiled file without actually calling <tt>compile-file</tt>.
|
||
|
|
In some implementations the compiler produces one of several file types,
|
||
|
|
depending on a variety of implementation-dependent circumstances,
|
||
|
|
so it is not sufficient simply to prescribe a standard logical file type
|
||
|
|
for compiled files;
|
||
|
|
<tt>compile-file-pathname</tt> provides access to the defaulting that is performed
|
||
|
|
by <tt>compile-file</tt> ``in a manner
|
||
|
|
appropriate to the implementation's file system conventions.''
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
The use of the logical pathname host name <tt>SYS</tt> for the implementation
|
||
|
|
is current practice. Standardizing on this name helps users choose
|
||
|
|
logical pathname host names that avoid conflicting with
|
||
|
|
implementation-defined names.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
Loading of logical pathname translations from a site-dependent file
|
||
|
|
allows software to be distributed using logical pathnames. The assumed
|
||
|
|
model of software distribution is a division of labor between the
|
||
|
|
supplier of the software and the user installing it. The supplier
|
||
|
|
chooses logical pathnames to name all the files used or created by the
|
||
|
|
software, and supplies examples of logical pathname translations for a
|
||
|
|
few popular file systems. Each example uses an assumed directory and/or
|
||
|
|
device name, assumes local file naming conventions, and provides
|
||
|
|
translations that will translate all the logical pathnames used or
|
||
|
|
generated by the particular software into valid physical pathnames.
|
||
|
|
For a powerful file system these translations can be quite simple. For
|
||
|
|
a more restricted file system, it may be necessary to list an explicit
|
||
|
|
translation for every logical pathname used (for example, when dealing
|
||
|
|
with restrictions on the maximum length of a file name).
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
The user installing the software decides on which device and directory
|
||
|
|
to store the files and edits the example logical pathname translations
|
||
|
|
accordingly. If necessary, the user also adjusts the translations for
|
||
|
|
local file naming conventions and any other special aspects of the user's
|
||
|
|
local file system policy and local Common Lisp implementation. For
|
||
|
|
example, the files might be divided among several file server hosts to
|
||
|
|
share the load. The process of defining site-customized logical pathname
|
||
|
|
translations is quite easy for a user of a popular file system for which
|
||
|
|
the software supplier has provided an example. A user of a more unusual
|
||
|
|
file system might have to take more time; the supplier can help by
|
||
|
|
providing a list of all the logical pathnames used or generated by the
|
||
|
|
software.Once the user has created and executed
|
||
|
|
a suitable <tt>setf</tt> form for setting the <tt>logical-pathname-translations</tt>
|
||
|
|
of the relevant logical host, the software can be loaded and run. It
|
||
|
|
may be necessary to use the translations again, or on another workstation
|
||
|
|
at the same site, so it is best to save the <tt>setf</tt> form in the standard
|
||
|
|
place where it can be found later by <tt>load-logical-pathname-translations</tt>.
|
||
|
|
Often a software supplier will include a program for restoring software
|
||
|
|
from the distribution medium to the file system and a program for loading
|
||
|
|
the software from the file system into a Common Lisp; these programs
|
||
|
|
will start by calling <tt>load-logical-pathname-translations</tt> to make sure that
|
||
|
|
the logical pathname host is defined.
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
Note that the <tt>setf</tt> of <tt>logical-pathname-translations</tt> form isn't part of
|
||
|
|
the program; it is separate and is written by the user, not by the
|
||
|
|
software supplier. That separation and a uniform convention for
|
||
|
|
doing the separation are the key aspects of logical pathnames. For small
|
||
|
|
programs involving only a handful of files, it doesn't matter much. The
|
||
|
|
real benefits come with large programs with hundreds or thousands of
|
||
|
|
files and more complicated situations such as program-generated file
|
||
|
|
names or porting a program developed on a system with long file names
|
||
|
|
onto a system with a very restrictive limit on the length of file names.
|
||
|
|
<br><img align=bottom alt="change_end" src="gif/change_end.gif">
|
||
|
|
<P>
|
||
|
|
<BR> <HR><A NAME=tex2html4218 HREF="node214.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="next" SRC="icons/next_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4216 HREF="node208.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="up" SRC="icons/up_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4212 HREF="node212.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="previous" SRC="icons/previous_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4220 HREF="node1.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="contents" SRC="icons/contents_motif.gif"></A> <A NAME=tex2html4221 HREF="index.html"><IMG ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="index" SRC="icons/index_motif.gif"></A> <BR>
|
||
|
|
<B> Next:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4219 HREF="node214.html"> Pathname Functions</A>
|
||
|
|
<B>Up:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4217 HREF="node208.html"> Logical Pathnames</A>
|
||
|
|
<B> Previous:</B> <A NAME=tex2html4213 HREF="node212.html"> Examples of the </A>
|
||
|
|
<HR> <P>
|
||
|
|
<HR>
|
||
|
|
<P><ADDRESS>
|
||
|
|
AI.Repository@cs.cmu.edu
|
||
|
|
</ADDRESS>
|
||
|
|
</BODY>
|